WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Hush money trial: Trump witness Costello back on the stand after admonishment
Timberwolves force Game 7 by blowing out Nuggets 115
Meghan and Prince Harry 'are planning to do more royal
Scottie Scheffler arrested at PGA Championship, returns to course
Election 2024: Nikki Haley faces a key decision on whether or not to endorse Trump
Funeral set for Roger Fortson, the Black US Air Force member killed in his home by Florida deputy
It's not a rock, it's the Athens Rock Lobsters. New minor league team honors B
Key Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems is laying off 450 after production of troubled 737s slows
'IF' movie review: John Krasinski’s film hits a box office nerve with $35 million debut
How just one horrible moment in your past could cause ALZHEIMER'S, according to new study